Is Cyril Ever Revealed as Wee Baby Seamus Dad

You know well-nigh how individuals proceeds control of the power of the State and then corruption that ability similar one-time United states President George "Dubya" Bush-league?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some Us businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious globe security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported past UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the Us with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'south weapons of mass destruction which did not be but which Blair claimed could exist deployed within xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you lot remember that then y'all will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin can save usa all if we trust them?

This trickery is non new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came nigh equally a outcome of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather, especially nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and information technology did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for piece of work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'due south first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent Past Andy McSmith Friday 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The centre and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would keep them rubber from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the so truly "slap-up unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" even so contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, United states, Sweden.

Now y'all tin can read a relatively brusk but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, United states of america & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused past the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the Uk, more than people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was non vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells united states of america. Whatever vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did non.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the reject in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the U.k. and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [come across table below].  Leicester's approach also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Pocket-size-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Regular army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Regal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	viii.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.ane

Biggs said "In this comparison, I accept given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I inquire, if the excessive minor-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Purple Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? Information technology would afford an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—merely on the reverse side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Pocket-size-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Price of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	xvi.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	v.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£ane,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the thought of vaccination got its starting time. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books present a uncomplicated tale of the origin of vaccination. Well-nigh present the same basic tale of the bright observation of a simple state doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or every bit it was often called the speckled monster. In a contempo and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-twelvemonth onetime male child named James Phipps to examination his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'due south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'due south easily. The boy came downwards with a slight fever, but nothing more than. Afterwards, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, instance of the disease. Cypher happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once again; again, zip. [1]

Edward Jenner'south idea somewhen became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin discussion for cow – vacca. Information technology was originally referred to every bit cowpoxing, simply somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the earth would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, especially those that are used to support a conventionalities, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects near the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of good for you people. This thought was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was but a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would exercise better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and identify in the futurity.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Only because of the complication and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could just exist afforded past the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, merely in that location was notwithstanding an estimated ii-v% that died every bit a result.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Just, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation solitary? Or could it accept had something to exercise with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of lodge?

There was 1 major and by and large unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than at that place would accept been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because it caused more than deaths than lives saved.

Information technology is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to end the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increment that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a heart of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[vii]

Withal, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Considering variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to exist spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

At present enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amidst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-twelvemonth-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a exam to run into if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to back up his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, at that place were doctors of the fourth dimension who challenged this myth, considering they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Dr.-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his exercise.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where minor-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the start there were problems with Jenner'southward procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested past being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results considering they were non in support of his theory.[ix]

Vaccination was chop-chop embraced by many in the medical profession equally the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'south ideas among numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month afterwards it was inoculated with small-pox matter without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-scale-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental manner from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of historic period, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summertime of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator'south name was concealed. 14. The kid of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'southward office . . . died of small-scale-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was non living up to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of pocket-size-pox later on vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[eleven] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct claiming to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small-scale Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the nigh expert practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brownish, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no 1 in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people all the same could contract and fifty-fifty dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were amply compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to comprehend it as a new form of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a doc to have spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could yet infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could likewise be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub about the small-pox. Information technology broke out with the dandy epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had minor-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but fell upon smashing numbers.[fourteen]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real minor-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, simply as failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh material direct from cows.[xvi]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the cloth originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would effect in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated information technology onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that moo-cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later enquiry determined that this was null more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Non only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were as well reports of deaths from other causes shortly subsequently vaccination. For case, a skin condition called erysipelas was a peculiarly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; 1 cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Considering arm-to-arm vaccination was existence used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. Only facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At nowadays I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the groovy 1872 epidemic. Afterward 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These echo smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the twenty years before.

Graph i: Boston smallpox bloodshed rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this signal, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were and then fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the bulk of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent md of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness fabricated by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the force of police force created the perfect surround that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators take received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 solitary they amounted to £54,727, and in the present yr they will get nearly a quarter 1000000. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a dishonest remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A dandy pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war at that place were 20-three thousand 4 hundred and sixty-nine cases of small-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and xc-two pocket-size-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand 8 hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole state more than than 1 hundred and twenty-two k vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from modest-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine condom, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the authorities and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the smashing demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same twelvemonth Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the utilise of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new regime that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to x%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would issue in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to command smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall subtract in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed every bit the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an middle-opener to the people and an heart-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a slap-up manufacturing boondocks having a population of virtually a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to minor-pox and far less afflicted by that illness since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted as a condom procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more ane,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its graphic symbol. After the summer of 1897, the astringent blazon of smallpox with its loftier death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed one in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to equally low as 1 in 380. The disease could still kill, just having get and so much milder, it was oft mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and afterward gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at start mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 commodity in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease rate was effectually 20%, as it had been historically. The table besides showed that after 1896 the death rate cruel off chop-chop, starting with half dozen% in 1897 to as depression as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild class of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could be hard to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable affliction of babyhood, and is chiefly important because it ofttimes gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

Past the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the fashion of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection past vaccination, the course of the illness is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the last smallpox death in the Us in 1948 upward until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a pare condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this affliction was estimated by the authors to be betwixt i in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to forty%.[35] However, they acknowledged that almost cases were not reported and at that place was no accurate accounting on this result of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had merely been 1 smallpox decease in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, merely since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is all the same occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military begetter after the begetter was vaccinated. Afterwards a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required handling and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even college. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United states of america. If the deaths were this high in a land with a modernistic wellness-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire world?

In that location were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which in one case had the suffrage of the nation has now inappreciably a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perchance afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put united states of america in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination as virtually the but medically promoted way to deal with affliction, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a diverseness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable equally a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, later on breakfast and at evening, for xiv days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the rubber treatment died, while among those under ordinary treatment the mortality was every bit usual.[forty]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have care of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the disease. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used iii or 4 times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Order, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front end in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take 2 or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a mean solar day." The word may now exist regarded every bit closed, and smallpox at terminal is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, simply only because almost people have been conditioned to have the age-erstwhile prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, affliction-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animate being'south (usually a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and haemorrhage. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and besides gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve every bit mortar property cells together and, as a consequence, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Male monarch'south College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and booze while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilt miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of stiff coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of decease listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such every bit smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for just a small fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died every bit a upshot of their wounds accounted only for i pct of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such equally scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (likewise known as pertussis) all profoundly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph six: England and Wales measles bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale fable of a country doc making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine organized religion. But the truthful history shows u.s.a. a different reality.

The make name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an disease. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of illness matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely constructive culling methods of sanitation, diet, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead nosotros were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a proficient thought to you?

More data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin can exist constitute in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
i.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, Md, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Admirer's Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
viii.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Instance Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
ix.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Dr., A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Periodical and Review, vol. 8, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
eighteen.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Physician, "Partial Report on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning time Chronicle, Midweek, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. six, Feb 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. xix, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, Dr., "A Physician'due south Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. ane, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June i, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, April sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
thirty.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not past the Propagation of Illness," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. Iii, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Blazon of Infectious disease every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the Usa," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. two, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the do of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume one, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
forty."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. ane, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Section of King'south Higher," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

hardenswerseavers.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post